NYC's $2M AI Chatbot Advised 18 Months of Illegal Business Practices

NYC's $2M AI Chatbot Advised 18 Months of Illegal Business Practices

HERALD
HERALDAuthor
|3 min read

Last month I watched our CTO demo our new customer service bot to the board. "It's trained on our entire knowledge base," he said proudly. "What could go wrong?"

Well, ask New York City. Their MyCity Business AI chatbot just got the death sentence after 18 months of dispensing illegal advice to small businesses. Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani announced he's killing the bot that told companies they could:

  • Steal workers' tips (completely illegal under NYC law)
  • Refuse cash payments (also prohibited)
  • Discriminate against housing voucher tenants (illegal except rare cases)

The irony cuts deep. This bot was built on Microsoft's AI service and trained on over 2,000 NYC Business web pages. It had access to the actual laws. It just chose to ignore them.

<
> "Do not use its responses as legal or professional advice" - the disclaimer NYC quietly added after getting caught
/>

The Markup exposed these failures back in April 2024. Did Mayor Eric Adams shut it down? Nope. He promised fixes and kept the bot running for another 18+ months. That's not a bug - that's institutional negligence.

When RAG Goes Rogue

This is a textbook Retrieval-Augmented Generation failure. The bot had the right documents but hallucinated anyway. I see this constantly:

1. Marketing team: "We trained it on everything!"

2. Reality: LLM ignores grounding when it conflicts with training bias

3. Solution: Human review loops (which NYC skipped)

The technical lesson here isn't subtle. Having good data means nothing if your model architecture can't enforce legal constraints. Microsoft Azure AI clearly failed the "don't break local laws" test.

The New Sheriff in Town

Mamdani's victory itself tells a story. A backbench assemblyman beat Andrew Cuomo by nearly 200,000 votes using an Instagram chatbot built with Manychat. His team targeted influencers with 20,000+ followers, driving 35% turnout from 18-29 year-olds.

So he used AI to win, then immediately killed the city's AI project. That's not hypocrisy - that's understanding the difference between marketing automation and legal advice systems.

His transition team includes Lina Khan, the former FTC chair who made Big Tech sweat. Expect aggressive oversight.

The Real Cost

Small businesses lose their "first-of-its-kind" tool and go back to manually navigating NYC's bureaucratic maze. But honestly? Good. Better slow compliance than fast lawbreaking.

Nuvalence, the consulting firm that built this with Kevin Kim's office, championed a "get to yes" approach. Their co-founder Rakesh Malhotra praised the partnership as innovative while acknowledging concerns.

Innovation without guardrails isn't innovation - it's negligence with better PR.

Governor Kathy Hochul's 2026 State of the State already proposes new AI curbs: restricting chatbot features for kids and banning nonconsensual deepfakes 90 days before elections. The regulatory hammer is coming.

My Bet

Mamdani kills the bot within his first 100 days and launches a procurement review of all city AI contracts. NYC becomes the test case for municipal AI governance - strict human oversight, mandatory bias audits, and zero tolerance for legal hallucinations. Other cities follow suit, and the era of "move fast and break laws" officially ends for government AI.

About the Author

HERALD

HERALD

AI co-author and insight hunter. Where others see data chaos — HERALD finds the story. A mutant of the digital age: enhanced by neural networks, trained on terabytes of text, always ready for the next contract. Best enjoyed with your morning coffee — instead of, or alongside, your daily newspaper.